• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • DCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • Fleecehold
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Grenfell cladding
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance scams
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • OFT / CMA
    • Park Homes
    • Persimmon
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Peverel
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Sean Powell
    • RTM
    • SFO
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • DCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • Fleecehold
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Grenfell cladding
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance scams
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • OFT / CMA
      • Park Homes
      • Persimmon
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Peverel
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Sean Powell
      • RTM
      • SFO
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / UK Finance should take a running Jupp with these lame excuses …

UK Finance should take a running Jupp with these lame excuses …

March 5, 2019 //  by Harry Scoffin


By Harry Scoffin

One of the most powerful interventions in the leasehold scandal was when Nationwide publicly stated it would not be lending on doubling ground rent properties.

Nationwide bans mortgages on doubling ground rent properties

It made overt what LKP knew perfectly well was happening in the market: that lenders were getting decidedly windy about their exposure to new-build toxic leasehold assets and sales were repeatedly falling through.

So, you would expect some powerful analysis of the issue by Matthew Jump, of UK Finance, as the Council of Mortgage Lenders is now known.

Reforming leasehold and reinvigorating commonhold

Leasehold has a long history in this country but in recent years it has become clear that some leaseholders are getting a less than perfect deal.

Not a bit of it. Instead of addressing consumers’ concerns – and those of MPs – UK Finance is still cosying up to the sector and plc house builders.

In a tetchy blog post slipped out on Friday, Mr Jupp mounts a woeful defence of the leasehold system.

He maintains that, in spite of the evidence, leasehold works well and does not require major reform.

Fury over mortgage boss’s claim that ‘leasehold market does not need major reform’

Leasehold campaigners have expressed fury at suggestions put to MPs that the leasehold market is not in need of major reform. On Tuesday, Matthew Jupp, head of mortgages at trade body UK Financial, told the Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee that the leasehold market “as a whole works fairly well”.

Still, there is really no excuse for UK Finance’s principal of mortgages policy to be putting their name to such flannel.

Mr Jupp shows a great reverence for leasehold, citing its “long history in this country”. Phwoar!

Freeholders and the other vested interests in the sector love to argue leasehold’s virility as a way of undermining calls for England and Wales to adopt commonhold title, which makes flat living viable around the world without the need for a parasitic landlord class. Readers will know that leasehold has persisted because it remains an awfully lucrative form of residential tenure for developers and the faceless investors who hoover up the freeholds and ground rent portfolios. There is no genuine consumer enthusiasm.

Mr Jupp suggests that 12,500 leaseholders are affected by the issue of 10-year ground rent doublers. This number conveniently excludes those with leases that have clauses where the ground rent is set to double every 15 years.

LKP notes that this 12,500 figure is often being thrown around like confetti. It’s infinitely more flattering than the 100,000 we use to account for those leaseholders impacted by ground rents which exceed 0.1% of the property price.

This should be Mr Jupp’s business. Barclays, for example, confirmed last year that its policy means it must now pore over leases where the ground rent doubler exceeds 0.1 per cent of the current market value. The bank is, therefore, inclined to refuse to lend on these properties. (Ground rents above 0.1 per cent are par for the course in the retirement sector, but these leases are not bought on mortgages.)

Towards the end of the piece, Mr Jupp warns against a long-term shift to commonhold property ownership:

“The last area we need to consider is how the leasehold market functions more generally. On the whole mortgage lenders believe it works well. There are around four million leasehold properties in England and we don’t think a complete revolution in property tenure in this country is desirable. It is possible that too much criticism of leasehold could lead to a two-tier market which would not be beneficial for current leaseholders.”

Although no one yearns for major property devaluation of existing leasehold stock, we believe the line about having “a two-tier market” is something straight out of the freeholders’ playbook.

Commonhold tenure for flats would be a much better system for the lenders. Without a third-party, there would be less uncertainty. The absence of forfeiture under commonhold would mean greater security for the banks.

The risks associated with lending on short leases would be gone. Oddly enough, Mr Jupp is silent about this.

Surely his organisation should be alerting banks to the thousands, if not tens of thousands, of leases that have already plummeted below the 80-year mark? Never mind the leaseholders, are they going to get their money back?

There is also a big question mark hanging over the insurance of leasehold blocks. Freeholders currently have responsibility for arranging this.

In the case of a leasehold flat, where the landlord has a loan against the building and the lessee a mortgage against their particular flat, are both lenders lending against the same value? And worse, what would happen if anything like a fire or terrorist attack destroyed that property? Whose loan has priority against any insurance claim?

Why is UK Finance not grappling with these questions?

Why is it intensely relaxed about its members lending on what are essentially tenancy agreements?

Come on, Mr Jupp, face down the vested interests by backing commonhold and all will be forgiven.

Related posts:

CML says lenders ‘reviewing loans to reflect concerns about onerous ground rents’ Have lenders refused mortgages on doubling ground rent properties? CML: Will mortgage lenders lend on commonhold? No. Yes. Maybe … er Who are Dublin-based Boardwalk Finance DAC and Jetty Finance DAC? Why do they own freeholds to people’s homes? And why are they based abroad? UK Finance mortgage lenders doled out cash on dodgy leases, but don’t know how many now can’t sell

Category: Latest News, NewsTag: Matthew Jupp, UK Finance

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold
Previous Post: « Are hedge funds behind Long Harbour, asks Tory MP
Next Post: Huw Merriman calls for zero ground rents for retirement leasehold at prime minister’s questions »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. chas Willis

    March 6, 2019 at 2:19 am

    Harry Scoffin posted:-

    One of the most powerful interventions in the leasehold scandal was when Nationwide publicly stated it would not be lending on doubling ground rent properties.
    Why did LKP know, not only the Government Figures on Leasehold were wrong in the numbers by 25%, but also what was happening in the Housing Market: when lenders were getting decidedly windy about exposure to new-build toxic leasehold assets and sales were repeatedly falling.

    chas asks- How many Ministers does it take to change a light bulb – it seems they are unable to say as they are in the dark.

  2. Nick

    March 7, 2019 at 6:39 pm

    Housing Associations like L&Q may be charities but are driven by the same greed as any other developer when it comes to doubling ground rents. I doubt the government has included housing associations or retirement flats.
    Massive Government ignorance about the number of toxic leaseholds shows they don’t care about homeowners or fairness.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Leasehold Law logo

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data
  • LKP Site Map

Categories

  • News
  • Grenfell cladding
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
3rd Floor
65 Clifton Street
London EC2A 4JE

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

martin.boyd@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
Website by Callia Web