• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • DCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • Fleecehold
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Grenfell cladding
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance scams
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • OFT / CMA
    • Park Homes
    • Persimmon
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Peverel
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Sean Powell
    • RTM
    • SFO
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • DCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • Fleecehold
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Grenfell cladding
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance scams
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • OFT / CMA
      • Park Homes
      • Persimmon
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Peverel
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Sean Powell
      • RTM
      • SFO
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Southwark council leaseholders see major works bill slashed from £17,000 to £8,000

Southwark council leaseholders see major works bill slashed from £17,000 to £8,000

March 9, 2017 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Local authority leaseholders in Southwark, south London, have won a tribunal case over major works.

It means that 134 leaseholders in the St Saviour estate, in Bermondsey, will see bills slashed from averaging £17,000 to £8,000.

The council had replaced all the front doors on the estate and carried out other works such as communal decorations and fire protection, reports Southwark News

A band of 88 leaseholders joined forces to challenge the council at a tribunal, where the bills were successfully reduced to £8,000.

The council appealed to a higher tribunal but has now lost again.

Jean Langridge, 85, who has lived on the estate for 34 years, was handed a £19,000 estimated bill for works, while resident Samantha Mitchell was given an estimate of £17,000.

Speaking to Southwark News, Samantha said:

“When I tried to talk to them [the council] right from the beginning they told us to go to the court. There was no trying to engage with us in a dialogue.

“All we wanted was a fair, transparent process and for it to be done properly.”

Welcoming the Upper Tribunal’s decision, Olayinka Mosadomi, representative for St Owen’s House, said: “We tried, on many occasions, to talk to Southwark, yet, despite their mantra of ‘securing fair value’, nothing about the way Southwark was conducting itself or treating residents was remotely fair.

“There wasn’t any proper assessment of what was really needed or a genuine desire to consult with leaseholders.

“We knew these charges were unfair and unnecessary yet the council was blasé in its decision-making and wasted public money to take us to court. This ruling is now an important lesson for this council and also many up and down the country.”

Southwark Liberal Democrat councillors have asked the council how much it has spent on fighting the St Saviour’s leaseholders in court, whether it will now be meeting the leaseholders’ costs, and when leaseholders on the estate can expect revised major works bills or to be refunded.

They have also asked about the wider implications for leaseholder bills in future major works projects.

Lib Dem councillor Damian O’Brien said: “Liberal Democrat councillors are fighting residents’ corner and will push the Labour council to get a fair deal for leaseholders on the St Saviour’s estate and all future major works schemes across the borough.”

Cllr Stephanie Cryan, Southwark Council’s cabinet member for housing, said: “The leaseholders applied to the First Tier Tribunal, which agreed with the council that most of the work was necessary but reduced the amounts for all door renewals only.

Leaseholders are billed on an estimated basis and then adjusted when the actual costs are known.

“Ultimately, if leaseholders do not pay the bills that they are responsible for, council tenants would have to make up the shortfall through their rent.”

This last point is questionable, in the view of LKP.

Related posts:

£146,257 – the highest major works bill ever? Oxford leaseholders win first round against £60,000 major works bills BBC features 50 Oxford City Council leaseholders facing £50,000 major works bill George Osborne’s former nanny faces £100,000 bill and homelessness after refusing to pay major works on her leasehold ex-council flat Brighton council leaseholders win refunds for major works

Category: Latest News, Local authority leasehold, News, PressTag: Local authority leasehold, major works, Southwark, Southwark News

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold
Previous Post: « ITV News covers the leasehold house scandal, and homeowners stage mass demo on March 18
Next Post: Oxford leaseholders win first round against £60,000 major works bills »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Michael Epstein

    March 9, 2017 at 10:33 am

    Is this the same Southwark Council that has just been fined 570,000 pounds over their admitted failures in the l fire at Lakanal House which resulted in 6 fatalities?
    On the basis that Southwark council appears to be saying that “If leaseholders don’t pay up (even if the demands for payment are unlawful) council tenants will have their rents increased” I wonder who actually will end up paying Southwark Council’s fine?

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Leasehold Law logo

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data
  • LKP Site Map

Categories

  • News
  • Grenfell cladding
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
3rd Floor
65 Clifton Street
London EC2A 4JE

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

martin.boyd@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2021 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
Website by Callia Web