• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • DCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • Fleecehold
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Grenfell cladding
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance scams
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • OFT / CMA
    • Park Homes
    • Persimmon
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Peverel
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Sean Powell
    • RTM
    • SFO
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • DCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • Fleecehold
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Grenfell cladding
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance scams
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • OFT / CMA
      • Park Homes
      • Persimmon
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Peverel
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Sean Powell
      • RTM
      • SFO
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / Lendlease caves in over £5m Grenfell cladding bills at Vallea Court and Cypress Place

Lendlease caves in over £5m Grenfell cladding bills at Vallea Court and Cypress Place

March 9, 2019 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Lendlease, which has just won a multi-million contract to refurb Manchester town hall, has decided that it will, on reflection, pay to remove cladding at Vallea Court and Cypress Place in the city. This is a huge relief for the leaseholders, and a magnificent achievement for them

In yet another retreat by plc house builders, the Aussie giant Lendlease is stumping up to pay to remove the Grenfell cladding at Vallea Court and Cypress Place, in Manchester’s Green Quarter.

Before government ministers start talking rubbish about “freeholders doing the decent thing” – or worse, describing these speculators in residential freehold income streams as “responsible long-term custodians” – let’s just clear a few things up.

The bill is £5 million, which is rather beyond the scope of freehold owner Pemberstone, which was reporting £75,000 in the accounts in 2017.

It is a huge bill and Lendlease is paying it.

Lendlease to pay for £5m Manchester block reclads

Lendlease has agreed to pay for the replacement of flammable cladding on two tower blocks in Manchester’s Green Quarter. Residents had been campaigning for two years to make the buildings safe after unsafe cladding was found following Grenfell tragedy safety check. The contractor agreed to fund the project along with freeholder Pemberstone.

Leaseholders spared £10k cladding bill

Leaseholders in two high-rise blocks have spoken of their relief that they will not have to pay £10,000 each to replace dangerous cladding. Freeholder Pemberstone has announced a fund has been set up to pay for the work at Cypress Place and Vallea Court in Manchester. Leaseholder Beverley Reynolds-Logue said: “I’m absolutely delighted.

Doubtless the housebuilding and freeholder lobbyists are hard at work validating the leasehold system and its professional freehold investors.

But the truth of the matter is that Lendlease has capitulated over the inevitable reputational fallout.

Pemberstone had already won last year a court ruling that leaseholders rather than itself would be responsible to pay up for cladding removal.

Having Lendlease pay instead is an excellent result, and many congratulations to the leaseholders who made this issue as public and embarrassing as they could for property interests which would have been more than happy to land them in it.

Sadly, not all the private cladding sites have large plc house builders to call on.

Northpoint in Bromley is problematic because it was built in 1999 by Alfred McAlpine Homes. It was acquired by Taylor Wimpey, but that entity is still holding out. We hope that it will cave in, in time.

Tchenguiz group dismisses government ‘hollow threat’ to make freeholders pay for Grenfell cladding removal

Heysmoor Heights in Liverpool is even worse: the builder went bust long ago. The freehold is owned by anonymous private equity interests in Abacus Land 4 Limited, based in Guernsey, which is part of the £1.4 billion portfolio of residential freeholds in the Long Harbour fund.

The ultimate ownership is carefully hidden behind nominee directors of the Sanne Group – and they are very likely to remain hidden under the circumstances.

The freeholders issued a loan to the site to pay for fire marshals – it risked prosecution if it had not done so, although it could have evacuated the building altogether. But they also successfully obtained a ruling that leaseholders pay to remove the Grenfell cladding.

It is a grim situation, and there are other private sites in the same position.

But the lesson from Vallea Court and Cypress Place, where a plc house builder put this cladding on the sites, is: shout from the rooftops and get as much media and political attention as possible.

Government is truly fed up with plc house builders breaking the rules – spreading toxic leases all over the country; making a mockery of the Help To Buy scheme; paying outrageous salaries to unremarkable executives (yes, that’s you, Jeff Fairburn).

And the big house builders need government on side.

Only a couple of the Irish house builders have aggressively pushed back over Grenfell, but wisely they, too, have become more emollient, doubtless aware that a few disobliging questions about their tax status would be even more unwelcome than stumping up a few million for cladding removal.

Related posts:

£3m Grenfell cladding bills fall on residents at Lendlease’s Cypress Place and Vallea Court Ground rent speculators Pemberstone seek £3m tribunal ruling over Grenfell cladding Grenfell cladding leaseholders despair of government doing anything .. APPG hears agony of Grenfell cladding on private sites, while Lendlease sites head to tribunal to get leaseholders to pay Fury in Manchester as Lendlease wins £160m contract to refurb city hall, while dumping Grenfell cladding costs on leaseholders

Category: Grenfell cladding, Latest News, News, PressTag: Cypress Place, Grenfell cladding, Lendlease, Vallea Court

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold
Previous Post: « Brokenshire demanding action for 100,000 trapped in toxic leasehold homes five months ago
Next Post: At last! A public defence of the leasehold system from an articulate freeholder … »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Michael Epstein

    March 9, 2019 at 5:58 pm

    I wonder what would happen, if taken to court it could be proved that the cladding fitted had been shown to be unsafe before the Grenfell tragedy?
    What then for the developers and those charged with ensuring building safety?
    What if it could be proved that a lower specification cladding had been fitted that was not in accordance with the submitted specifications?
    What if leaseholders were forced to pay the costs of replacing the dangerous cladding?
    That being the case, who then would be liable for the costs of replacing the dangerous cladding on Government buildings such as schools and hospitals?
    It is unfortunate(though understandable that leaseholders of Heysmoor House in Liverpool accepted a loan towards the cost of employing fire marshals.
    It is not generally understood that in accepting a loan the leaseholders have inadvertently accepted liability.

  2. chas Willis

    March 9, 2019 at 9:47 pm

    Michael
    If taken to court and it could be proved cladding fitted was Not Fit for Purpose, this I believe can not be seen as a Leasehold Problem but is between the Building Team including the Local Authority.

    Building Teams and those charged with ensuring Building Safety, have been seen as also Not Fit For Purpose and as Leases are so Vague,

    If it could be proved that a lower specification cladding had been fitted that was not in accordance with the submitted specifications, why is this a Leaseholder Problem?

    You say what if leaseholders were forced to pay the costs of replacing the dangerous cladding, then who would be liable for the costs of replacing the dangerous cladding on Government buildings such as schools and hospitals?

    If the leaseholders of Heysmoor House in Liverpool accepted a loan towards the cost of employing fire marshals those offering the loan would have known in accepting a loan the leaseholders have inadvertently accepted liability, very clever move, can this be challenged in court.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Leasehold Law logo

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data
  • LKP Site Map

Categories

  • News
  • Grenfell cladding
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
3rd Floor
65 Clifton Street
London EC2A 4JE

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

martin.boyd@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
Website by Callia Web