• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • DCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • Fleecehold
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Grenfell cladding
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance scams
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • OFT / CMA
    • Park Homes
    • Persimmon
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Peverel
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Sean Powell
    • RTM
    • SFO
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • DCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • Fleecehold
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Grenfell cladding
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance scams
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • OFT / CMA
      • Park Homes
      • Persimmon
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Peverel
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Sean Powell
      • RTM
      • SFO
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Law Commission: ‘We want to hear about problems in leasehold law’

Law Commission: ‘We want to hear about problems in leasehold law’

July 21, 2016 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

LKP met Professor Nick Hopkins, the Law Commissioner concerned with property law, at Westminster yesterday.

The meeting, held by Sir Peter Bottomley and Jim Fitzpatrick – the MP patrons of LKP – and trustees Martin Boyd and Sebastian O’Kelly – concerned issues surrounding leasehold law as part of the 13th law reform consultation which launched at the Supreme Court on July 14.

In particular, discussion focussed on establishing a consolidation act to bring together all existing leasehold law into a coherent whole.

Mr Boyd is a leaseholder at Charter Quay in Kingston, Surrey, and co-owns the freehold along with the other leaseholders at the site after an epic showdown between the leaseholders and the previous freehold owner, ultimately Vincent Tchenguiz.

“As one of the joint freeholders at Charter Quay, I have to say that the laws as they stand suit me me fine,” Mr Boyd told the meeting. “But as a leaseholder, I am considerably disadvantaged.

“There is no balance in leasehold law; its is weighted considerably towards freeholders.”

Mr Boyd referred the “one-way casino” of legal costs, which allows freeholders to claim their legal costs – even in a case they do not win – while leaseholders get no costs at all.

Another issue raised was forfeiture, which was considered by the Law Commission in 2006.

It is still unknown how many cases of forfeiture come before the county courts, and the government declined to answer on grounds of cost a Parliamentary Question on the subject from Emma Reynolds, when Labour shadow communities secretary.

LKP is well aware that forfeiture is threatened routinely. It also believes it is granted with more frequency than the sector likes to believe.

As forfeiture can lead to a considerable cash windfall to the freeholder – which no one in the leasehold sector has attempted to justify – it is urgently required that forfeiture’s fundamental unfairness is addressed.

The criminal courts, in Regina v Waya, scrupulously returned seed capital to a mortgage fraudster involved in leasehold flat scams.

Mr Waya was treated far more leniently than leaseholders in the civil courts faced with forfeiture. The case was discussed by David McCluskey, a partner at Peters & Peters, for the Law Society here

The Law Commission said: “There is a raft of legislation governing long and short residential tenancies, which is vital for those with an interest in the millions of such tenancies in England and Wales.

“In England alone, the most recent statistics show 8.2 million households being rented privately or socially, and 4.1 million dwellings being held under a long residential tenancy.

“We are interested to hear whether there are areas where the law is causing practical difficulties for landlords and tenants.

“For example, the existing regulation of service charges payable by tenants of long residential leases could be examined.

“The Competition and Markets Authority has recommended a review of the regime governing the recoverability of charges in respect of major works and long-term agreements (in section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985), which it criticised for being out of date and inflexible.

“It also recommended that tenants of long residential leases be given a new power to require a landlord to re-tender for property management services.

“Another related issue flows from our work on event fees in retirement properties.

“In that work we looked at one potentially unfair term – namely a requirement to pay a fee on a particular event, such as when a lease is sold.

“Other terms may also be potentially unfair, such as ground rents subject to exponential price escalation clauses.

“But it is unclear how unfair terms law applies to residential leases made between a consumer leaseholder and a business tenant once the lease is sold to a new leaseholder or a new landlord.

“The upshot of this uncertainty (and others) is a gap in consumer protection for leaseholders.

“We want to hear about problems in residential leasehold law and in particular how common those problems are, the extent to which they have a practical and economic impact, and why they should be considered a law reform priority.”

The Law Commission will be looking for proposals for areas of law they might review in the period 2017-2020. They are dependent on individual government departments sponsoring issues suggested for change but they also need to hearing from the public by 31st October 2016. A copy of the Law commissions programme page with a link to their online questionnaire can be found here.

You can contact the Law Commission here

Related posts:

Law Commission likely to end the exit and sublet fee payola Will Law Commission bring in the ‘seismic changes’ that leasehold needs? Too expensive to give figures on leasehold forfeiture, says Ministry of Justice DCLG stakeholders hear of ‘calamitous’ Law Commission report on exit fees APPG, December 6: Park home banditry; Law Commission; Planners barring leasehold houses; London deputy mayor; gargantuan Grenfell bills for leaseholders

Category: Latest News, Law Commission, News, ParliamentTag: Jim Fitzpatrick, Law Commision, Martin Boyd, Sir Peter Bottomley

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold
Previous Post: « Commonhold or leasehold, it still needs managing
Next Post: Stop the leasehold ‘rip-offs’ by joining our APPG, Fitzpatrick tells MPs »

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Leasehold Law logo

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data
  • LKP Site Map

Categories

  • News
  • Grenfell cladding
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
3rd Floor
65 Clifton Street
London EC2A 4JE

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

martin.boyd@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2021 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
Website by Callia Web