• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • DCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • Fleecehold
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Grenfell cladding
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance scams
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • OFT / CMA
    • Park Homes
    • Persimmon
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Peverel
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Sean Powell
    • RTM
    • SFO
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • DCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • Fleecehold
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Grenfell cladding
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance scams
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • OFT / CMA
      • Park Homes
      • Persimmon
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Peverel
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Sean Powell
      • RTM
      • SFO
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / Benjamin Mire / Benjamin Mire fails to block RICS disciplinary investigation in the high court

Benjamin Mire fails to block RICS disciplinary investigation in the high court

February 5, 2015 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

… and he has suffered “anguish, apprehension and £3 million in losses” since being removed from his judicial appointment at the property tribunal. And there’s the “impact on his human rights”

BenjaminMireProperty manager Benjamin Mire (left) yesterday failed in the high court to block RICS from conducting a disciplinary investigation into his conduct.

Mr Mire, a chartered surveyor and the CEO of Trust Property Management of Colindale, north London, was seeking a judicial review into a decision by RICS on September 5 2014 to go forward with a disciplinary hearing following an investigation that began in 2013.

Mr Mire came to public attention following complaints by leaseholders into his holding a part-time judicial appointment on the property tribunal while frequently appearing before it as a property manager.

As a result, Mr Mire was the subject of a Judicial Conduct Investigations Office hearing in 2013, but he resigned his judicial appointment before its conclusion.

In an exceptional move, the JCIO made clear that he would have been sacked in any case. It said:

“Mr Mire had failed to observe the standards that could reasonably be expected of a judicial office holder and that this failing was sufficiently serious to justify his removal from office.”

In September 2014 RICS informed Mr Mire that it was going ahead with an investigation into his professional conduct.

The high court was told that two points were at issue:

– that Mr Mire had failed to declare that he was a tribunal panel member in cases where he appeared as an advocate and /or witness.

– that he sought to gain commercial advantage as a surveyor from his position as a panel member of the property tribunal.

A total of 57 cases of possible conflict of interest are indicated in the JCIO report, the court heard.

Counsel for Mr Mire suggested that the RICS investigation “raised the question whether there is an impact on his human rights and that it would cause anguish, apprehension and potentially interfere with his psychological and physical condition as well as imperilling his reputation”.

Since the JCIO made its investigation public, Mr Mire had suffered £3 million of losses, it was argued. He would be willing to supply an additional affidavit concerning his mental state, and that of Mrs Mire, as a result of the JCIO findings and the proposed RICS disciplinary hearing.

But the judge said there was no particular evidence that Mr Mire would be subject to additional stress or anxiety than any other person facing a RICS disciplinary hearing.

Costs of £6,483 plus VAT were awarded to RICS, and it can be assumed that the costs of Mr Mire, who was also represented by counsel, would be comparable.

After the hearing, Sir Peter Bottomley said:

“Mr Benjamin Mire’s actions have caused too much harm to too many.

“It is appropriate that he has been refused repeated judicial review applications.

“His professional competence has been challenged. It is right that his professional regulator can do its duty without hindrance or interference.”

SiobhanMcGrathSebastian O’Kelly, of the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership, publicly raised the issue with Siobhan McGrath (right), senior president of the Residential Property Tribunal Service (RPTS), at yesterday’s annual conference of the Leasehold Advisory Service.

Without naming Mr Mire whose high court case was at that moment still in progress, he asked whether she was confident that other professional panel members of the property tribunal may not be similarly conflicted.

Judge McGrath said that she was confident that procedures had been improved at the tribunal service.

In July 2014, Judge McGrath apologised to leaseholder Colin Dennard for the RPTS’s handling of his complaint.

This was not, however, a spontaneous apology, but one that resulted from a recommendation by Sir John Brigstocke, the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman, who upheld Mr Dennard’s complaints that both the RPTS and the JCIO had let him down.

“I recommend that the head of the JCIO and the senior president [McGrath] write to Mr Dennard to apologise for the failings that have been identified in my report,” Sir John wrote.

Related posts:

Parliamentary Questions over Benjamin Mire case Benjamin Mire ‘resigns’ from property tribunal panel after complaints RICS sets aside two-day disciplinary hearing for Benjamin Mire Case against Benjamin Mire collapses, as RICS disciplinary process descends into shambles RICS exonerates Benjamin Mire in shock ruling

Category: Benjamin Mire, Latest News, NewsTag: Benjamin Mire, Sebastian O’Kelly, Siobhan McGrath, Sir Peter Bottomley

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold
Previous Post: « Janet Entwistle stands down at Peverel …
Next Post: Re-energised LEASE holds annual conference »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Trevor Bradley

    February 5, 2015 at 11:57 pm

    What planet are these people on. Suffered a 3 million pound loss!! Oh dear, what a shame. I can’t stop crying. In the real world a £3000 or even £300 loss is total disaster to the ordinary hard working honest person in this country. An “impact on his human rights” – people like this should not be entitled to ANY rights

  2. Michael Epstein

    February 6, 2015 at 8:07 pm

    Perhaps leaseholders can help ease the burdens of Mr Mire, by sacking Trust Properties?
    It will be of interest to find out if Mr Mire’s” issues” have any bearing on Trust obtaining ARMA-Q status?

  3. Karen

    February 9, 2015 at 2:06 pm

    Well done Simin for standing your ground throughout the years because without people like you standing up to the bullies, I am quite sure Mire would still be trading…

    Simin, If you haven’t already, why don’t you copy all the letters from Mires, Trust Properties, LVT etc and send them to the RICS investigator by recorded delivery? there are some interesting comments/quotes from the senders!

    It may also be worth adding up all the money it has cost you in stress, legal fees, time off work, etc etc… over the years….. I bet it could be around the £3,000,000 mark by now 🙂

    I would hope RICS could investigate your case further and it would be interesting to see if they reply to you.!

    It’s amazing the lengths some individuals will go to, to avoid an investigation !!!!!!!!

  4. chas

    February 9, 2015 at 4:40 pm

    The RICS, like other organisations that have any link to leasehold, who have been let down by Managing Agents/Freeholders/Landlords have shown little or no interest in the problems that are caused by their members, who have any input into Leasehold?.

    I remember in the 1970s to the 1990s where RICS was the Gold Standard, what has happened to this organisation who seems to say nothing?

  5. John

    February 11, 2015 at 10:42 pm

    as ex employee i’m delighted to hear it. mire and his mates i.e finegold, yun deserve it !!!

    • admin

      February 12, 2015 at 8:46 am

      Please contact us if you have non-attributable information that would be of relevance.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Leasehold Law logo

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data
  • LKP Site Map

Categories

  • News
  • Grenfell cladding
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
3rd Floor
65 Clifton Street
London EC2A 4JE

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

martin.boyd@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
Website by Callia Web