• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • DCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • Fleecehold
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Grenfell cladding
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance scams
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • OFT / CMA
    • Park Homes
    • Persimmon
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Peverel
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Sean Powell
    • RTM
    • SFO
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • DCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • Fleecehold
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Grenfell cladding
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance scams
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • OFT / CMA
      • Park Homes
      • Persimmon
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Peverel
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Sean Powell
      • RTM
      • SFO
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / 99% of FirstPort’s 3,800 service charge accounts are up to date

99% of FirstPort’s 3,800 service charge accounts are up to date

October 28, 2016 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

The FirstPort accounts department in action. The company is the largest property manager in the UK
The FirstPort accounts department in action. The company is the largest property manager in the UK

LKP  has not been backward in criticising Peverel / FirstPort over the years.

However, it is reasonable and fair that the company’s achievement in getting on top of the service charge accounts is recognised.

Here FirstPort CEO Nigel Howell (below right) explains that more than 99% of its service charge accounts are completed on time


nigelhowellThe Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 provides a statutory framework that governs how Landlords must deal with and account for Leaseholders’ money.

As part of this, residential property managers are required to submit a budget of the coming year’s costs to every development within one month of the year-end date, and accounts for the year within six months of the development year-end date.

As the largest UK residential property manager, FirstPort has 3,800 service charge budgets and accounts to complete each year, with scheme year-ends occurring at different months throughout the year.

FirstPort is happy to confirm that their budgets and accounts are up-to-date with over 99% complete on time per the Act, with the few remaining documents almost wholly complete awaiting Resident Management Company director sign-off.

As well as being timely, it is important that both financial documents are accurate, easy to read, and clear to ensure residents have the clarity on spend in their development and a transparent audit trail.

Therefore, whilst auditing the accounts is not a statutory obligation, FirstPort adopts best practice to provide an independent true and fair view of the finances of the developments.

Where FirstPort appoints the auditor all the accounts are fully audited by one of the UK’s largest professional audit practices, BDO.

The company delivers its development finances through a skilled team of experienced staff along with IT investments in an on-line purchasing and approval system and good accounts software to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the budgets and accounts.

With its size the company can achieve scale purchasing power for development operating spend and passes all of the price and quality benefits onto customers, taking no commissions on the spend.

It also maintains completely separate real bank accounts for every development, held under statutory Trust arrangements with Barclays Bank, and all of the bank accounts are reconciled every single day.

Related posts:

MPs told of the murky world of leasehold service charge accounts … by an accountant Britain’s biggest managing agent FirstPort sold on – again FirstPort backs down over demanding £10,808 from leaseholder … and she is not staying silent either Default ThumbnailLeaseholders thank JFM for turning around RTM site with £45,000 service charge arrears, reducing them to £800 in four months SCANDAL: LKP stops forfeiture of £800,000 flat … over a £7,000 service charge dispute

Category: Latest News, News, PeverelTag: FirstPort, Nigel Howell

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold
Previous Post: « Canary Riverside freeholder told to co-operate with court appointed managing agent
Next Post: Case against Benjamin Mire collapses, as RICS disciplinary process descends into shambles »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Paul Joseph

    October 29, 2016 at 12:04 pm

    What this article doesn’t say as clearly as it might is that FirstPort has made some changes from the previous worst practices of Peverel OM:

    1. Appointing someone who was effectively an internal auditor (on site, with an internal telephone extension) who relied on the company for most of his business and whose independence could reasonably be questioned; someone who was not subjected to any independent scrutiny.

    2. Rolling up estate accounts into an aggregate account, commingling the funds of leaseholders from numerous developments (See earlier story on this site on number of different “Pegasus Court”s for the extraordinary opportunities for accidental and “accidental” misattribution of expenses)

    It appears that there has also been some separation of functions to impose greater controls on procurement, things that would long ago have been standard in any properly run organization.

    These changes and getting the accounts done on time is surely welcome to all concerned, but most of all to FirstPort to whom the alternative may have been extinction — they lose the right to collect funds for service charges not billed within statutory limits. The reputational damage has been severe, hence the rebranding of Peverel.

    So, it’s a case of “Look, a leopard with new spots!”. (or “Look, a flying pig, wearing lipstick!”?)

    What are the chances of FirstPort offering any compensation to leaseholders who were ripped off in the past? I have no doubt that the current directors have a file of potential liabilities (paying service charges of defaulters from reserves e.g.).

    As someone who escaped from the worst practices of Peverel there is no chance I’d ever consider giving any business to FirstPort. It would take more than a new name and an “Improved” sticker on the box.

    This is not an LKP accredited company. My advice to any leaseholder is:

    1. Acquire the right to manage (LKP can point you in the right direction)
    2. Appoint an LKP accredited managing agent
    3. Acquire the freehold

  2. Michael Epstein

    October 29, 2016 at 4:24 pm

    Delighted to hear that according to Nigel Howell that 99% of service charge trust accounts are up to date.
    What of the treatment meted out to leaseholders who withheld service charge payments due to the accounts not being up to date?
    Will they receive an apology and a refund of any administration or debt collection charges?

  3. Reluctant crusader

    October 29, 2016 at 4:40 pm

    I totally agree. You can put lipstick down on a pig but it’s still a pig!

  4. Reluctant crusader

    October 29, 2016 at 4:42 pm

    Lipstick ON a pig, but it’s still a pig.

  5. Michael Epstein

    October 29, 2016 at 8:18 pm

    I am sure every one would agree with Nigel Howell on the importance of timely and accurate accounts.
    Perhaps he will be able to “encourage” Appello Telehealth/Careline to file their accounts with Companies House as they are currently listed as OVERDUE?

  6. Michael Epstein

    October 30, 2016 at 7:29 am

    Were the accounts at Hillside Court part of the 99% of development accounts referred to by Nigel Howell?
    That is the Hillside Court that only after the intervention of LKP had 39,377 pounds refunded to their trust account having wrongly paid exit fees to the freeholder instead of the service charge fund.
    Perhaps Mr Howell would like to clarify as to whether it was the Firstport accounts department, the auditor or Hillside Court residents that found the error?

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Leasehold Law logo

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data
  • LKP Site Map

Categories

  • News
  • Grenfell cladding
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
3rd Floor
65 Clifton Street
London EC2A 4JE

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

martin.boyd@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2021 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
Website by Callia Web